>To hyphenate or not to hyphenate: a well-timed question

>This might be a case of a little knowledge being dangerous. I understand, or have lately come to understand, the value of phrasal adjectives. They can be a handy way of tightening a sentence and removing static verbs. Typically, they require a hyphen as in a well-timed question. In the story that I workshopped recently (my just-workshopped story) I used several of these neat devices. But I got them wrong. I didn’t realize that there is an exception to the hyphen rule and John Casey pointed out my error (in two cases; he missed one). Here’s what Garner’s Modern American Usage has to say about the exception:

“When a phrasal adjective begins with an adverb ending in –ly, the convention is to drop the hyphen—e.g.: ‘With the hotly-contested [read hotly contested] Second Congressional District primary six days away, supporters of . . .’ But if the –ly adverb is part of a longer phrase, then the hyphen is mandatory (the not-so-hotly-contested race).”

It was the –ly that got me. Three times. Thus, the story in which my phrasal adjective errors occurred is my just-workshopped story or my recently workshopped story but not my recently-workshopped story.
I wonder how often I’ve gotten that wrong in the past.

2 thoughts on “>To hyphenate or not to hyphenate: a well-timed question”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.