>The New Yorker: "Transatlantic" by Colum McCann

>

April 16, 2012: “Transatlantic” by Colum McCann

As fans of Colum McCann know, the man likes to blur the lines between fact and fiction. Think of the tightrope walker in Let the Great World Spin. In this story, the two pilots who make an early Transatlantic flight are real historical figures, although other characters are invented.

But as I was reading the story, I didn’t know that. I suspected it—having heard McCann speak on the subject of fact/fiction just last weekend—but still didn’t know how the story would end. Midway through the reading, I began to worry that there were only two possible endings. After all, the two pilots at that point were half way through this dangerous journey and it wasn’t looking good. If they succeeded, that was going to be anticlimactic. Heroic, but boring. If they failed, that was going to be anticlimactic as well. There didn’t seem to be any good way out. History tells us that they succeeded, but, fortunately, the story doesn’t quite end there, and McCann pushes things a bit further. The pilots land on Irish soil and are met not only by British soldiers but by villagers coming from mass. The point has already been made that the airplane is a converted bomber—a wartime tool being converted to other purposes, and this, it seems, is where McCann has taken the story, and may also be where he is going with the new novel.

This is the “miracle of the actual,” a line from the story and one that I think he must have used in our seminar last weekend, although I can’t find it in my notes. It’s taking the real and boldly pushing it further. I highly recommend reading the Q&A with Colum McCann, which sheds further light on his approach. It also reveals, which wasn’t obvious to me, that this is actually a version of a chapter in his new book.

In my opinion, the best of the year so far.

1 thought on “>The New Yorker: "Transatlantic" by Colum McCann”

  1. >This was a great story. Beautiful sentences, beautiful imagery. In terms of plot, I shared your dilemna: either they make it or they don't. Also, I soon realized that if they made it, then the story would have to be based on historical events, whereas if they did not make it, McCann could have more liberty to invent. In any case, I think the movement of the story has more to do with what's happening in the characters' heads, so the drama was still keenly felt by me. The war imagery at the very end felt forced, however, so such as extent that he made a few over-obvious plays (Nein! Nein!). Just being in that plane, in that time period, on that mission, was plenty of life-or-death for me, and it carried the story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.